Joined
·
3,296 Posts
It seems a lot of people hate Pay Lakes. More correctly, they seem to intensely dislike fish being netted, legally or illegaly and sold legally or illegaly to these lakes. I have heard a lot about Natural resource depletion and mortality rates, as well as the inhumane treatment of these animals. Does anyone have any hard data supporting the claims of these mortality rates? Have there been studies on catfish to prove or disprove the depletion theory? I know that there have been millions spent studying bass and walleye and the resulting management including slot limits and creel limits have been impressive. Look at Lake Eries Walleye management. So far I have not found much.
I have found where a Mo fish farm stocks feeder size channels at a rate of 3000 to 5000 fish per surface acre. That seems like a lot to me.
I don't have a dog in the hunt so to speak. It has been told to me many times that if I lived in the area and witnessed first hand the alleged devastion that the commercial netters that I would be as passionate as others on here. Perhaps that is true, perhaps not. What I am looking for is usable information for both sides to mount their fight. Opinons, suppositions, hypotheses, etc... mean very little to the powers that be. Evidence is what you need. Anyhow, I am just trying to start a civilized discussion that gives factual evidence that can be used to encourage legal changes.
I have found where a Mo fish farm stocks feeder size channels at a rate of 3000 to 5000 fish per surface acre. That seems like a lot to me.
Day Eleven, Midwest TourCurrently catfish only occupy one pond on the farm, stocked at a density of 3000-3500 fish per surface acre. These fish typically enjoy a 95% survival rate, much of which can be attributed to research on these fish that has been taking place since the 1960s, and their nutritional requirements are understood better. Paulas main market for catfish is pay-lake farms, where people go to catch live fish and pay for the weight of fish that they catch and keep. Farms further south produce catfish for commercial processing plants, and are able to treat their fish more roughly at harvest time; however, as these fish need to stay live, they need to be treated more gently.
I don't have a dog in the hunt so to speak. It has been told to me many times that if I lived in the area and witnessed first hand the alleged devastion that the commercial netters that I would be as passionate as others on here. Perhaps that is true, perhaps not. What I am looking for is usable information for both sides to mount their fight. Opinons, suppositions, hypotheses, etc... mean very little to the powers that be. Evidence is what you need. Anyhow, I am just trying to start a civilized discussion that gives factual evidence that can be used to encourage legal changes.