There have been some rumors and controversy stirring about the Forrest/Rampage fight. From Rampage won, and the judges threw the match to Forrest, to Rampage threw the fight to garner more interest in a rematch, and whatever else. I will say that I came to the same conclusion as the judges. I would give round 1 and 4 to Rampage. I'm sure alot of people lost their butts betting on Rampage, and are just mad about that. Forrest was a serious underdog coming into this fight statistically, but that don't mean squat. Rampage said "This fight will not go to a decision." Well, it did, and Forrest won. If he didn't want Forrest to win, he shoulda found a way to finish him. He got beat in the same fashion that Chuck got beat by Jardine. He got out-struck. Forrest landed more strikes. Those leg kicks were killer, and neutralized Rampage's power. The way I see it, Forrest stuck to his game plan, made no mistakes, and won the fight due to more effective striking, and octagon control. It was his fight. He made Rampage fight his fight. I'm proud of Forrest. :cool2: What do you think?