I would like to hear some feedback on these. I have a cheapo Moultrie that I have been using. It works pretty well. But I do get a lot of blank pics with it. I am thinking that the trigger is not quick enough. My Moultrie however has a 4.0 megapixel image. I saw that the Cuddeback only has 3.1. I know that with some pieces a 3 can take better looking pics than a camera with a 5 or so though. Just wondering what your opinions might be. The Cuddeback is awfully expensive, didnt know if it was worth it or not.